Recently I criticized a Dominion Energy advertisement that boasted, misleadingly and inaccurately, about the company’s investments in solar energy.
By contrast, the company’s investments in greenwashing are transparent and heartfelt. Dominion has suffered through several bad months here in Virginia and would very much like to change the conversation.
Indeed, the company’s problems keep mounting. In the course of just two days this month, SCC commissioners lit into the company for telling Wall Street one thing and regulators another; the corporate customers behind Virginia’s data center boom filed a letter saying they want no part of Dominion’s fracked-gas build-out; and a coalition of libertarian, environmental and social justice groups called for a breakup of Dominion’s monopoly.
Fortunately, Dominion’s PR offensive was only just ramping up. A full-page newspaper ad, predictably light on detail, promises the company will cut its climate-heating methane emissions in half. That would be a nice trick from the company whose Atlantic Coast Pipeline will be responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than all Virginia’s power plants put together.
In case you doubt the company’s sincerity, Dominion just joined a corporate coalition calling for a price on carbon. This must have been in the works about the same time Dominion was criticizing Virginia’s proposed entry into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which actually puts a price on carbon.
Hey, The Washington Post fell for it. Greenwashing works.
And that brings us to the (literally) incredible claim that recently appeared in Dominion Energy’s Twitter feed: “The future of our planet depends on clean energy, which is why more than 85% of our generation comes from clean energy sources such as solar.”
Let us pause for a moment to reflect that this tweet comes from a company whose solar generation amounts to a rounding error.
Dominion Energy Virginia’s most recent Integrated Resource Plan includes a handy pie chart revealing what is actually in its energy mix:
- Nuclear: 33%
- Natural gas: 32%
- Coal: 18%
- Purchased (wholesale) power: 10% (that’s coal and gas)
- Non-Utility Generation (purchased under contract): 5% (more coal)
- Renewable: 2% (almost all hydro and biomass, plus a smidgen of solar)
- Oil: 0%
Now, it is true that Dominion Energy the holding company owns more generation than Dominion Energy Virginia the electric utility. For one thing, it just bought another utility in South Carolina. According to the information Dominion provided to investors in March, its South Carolina generation looks like this:
- Natural gas: 39%
- Coal: 36%
- Nuclear: 21%
- Hydro: 3%
Nobody looking at these figures could find a basis in reality for a claim of 85% clean energy. It is so preposterous that I just have to ask: Why only 85%?
I mean, seriously, if you have traveled this far into the realm of fantasy, why not claim 100%? Or heck, with a nod to Spinal Tap, why not 110%? Clearly the people making this stuff up are rank amateurs.
All of which is to say: come on, Dominion, you can do better.
Do they think natural gas is clean energy?
Calling gas clean (ignoring fracking pollution, methane leakage and CO2 emissions) is surely essential to the math. But I’ve heard Dominion staff call their coal-fired plant in Wise County a “clean coal plant,” so anything goes in greenwashing.
I thought coal WAS renewable. It just takes a bit longer to be “renewed” than most things. I guess that natural gas would fall into the same bucket. And while we’re at it, maybe nukular can be considered renewable.
Bob’s your uncle! That’s pretty close to 85%, isn’t it? They ain’t as think as I dumb they are.
When I click on the link in the Dominion Twitter feed it takes me to the quote that the 85% includes ‘natural gas-fired generation that supports renewables’ – I asked what that means (rhetorical).
Also sent a Tweet to Amazon asking why their name isn’t on the letter to Dominion.