Clean energy advocates who scrutinize Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe’s record see different things. Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), the Virginia Student Environmental Coalition (VSEC) and other groups recently released a mid-season “report card” that gave McAuliffe a D-plus on climate and energy. The bad grades primarily stem from his support of massive fracked-gas pipelines and offshore oil drilling, as well as Department of Environmental Quality’s (DEQ’s) approval of Dominion Virginia Power’s plans to “close” coal ash ponds by leaving toxic waste in unlined pits next to rivers.
Meanwhile, though, other environmental leaders are praising the governor for speaking out about the reality of climate change and promising to forge ahead with implementation of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan in spite of the current judicial stay. They also say McAuliffe should get more credit for his vetoes of bills attacking the Clean Power Plan and extending subsidies to coal companies.
It is possible to agree with both the criticism and the defense. McAuliffe’s enthusiastic support for Dominion’s Atlantic Coast Pipeline has been an enduring irritant to climate activists as well as to landowners along the planned routes of the ACP and other natural gas pipelines. A Sierra Club analysis concluded that the pipelines would increase the Commonwealth’s greenhouse gas footprint by more than twice the total emissions of all power plant generation in the state.
He is also rightly criticized for supporting off-shore drilling, which would increase climate pollution and sea level rise and threaten the Navy’s and tourism’s contributions to Hampton Roads’ economy—a potential double whammy for residents and businesses.
And the Virginia DEQ has begun to look a lot like its North Carolina counterpart, a captured agency incapable of defending our air and water from the corporate polluters it is supposed to regulate. Sure, the problem has festered through several administrations, but McAuliffe’s failure to intervene is impossible to reconcile with his pro-environment rhetoric.
The problem goes beyond DEQ. In response to a detailed petition to the Governor for an interagency review to modernize the state’s fracking regulations, McAuliffe’s Secretary of Commerce and Labor announced a plan to limit the issues and refer them to an industry-dominated organization funded by the American Petroleum Institute for decision. This is hardly a sign of a Governor committed to protecting the environment, safety and health.
Yet messaging matters, and McAuliffe is a vocal messenger on the topic of climate change. The governor points to the flooding that routinely shuts down streets in Norfolk as proof that human-caused sea level rise is already a problem right here in Virginia. And as a team player for the Democrats, he supports Obama’s Clean Power Plan even as he brags (superfluously and probably incorrectly) that he persuaded EPA to soften its Virginia targets to reduce our burden of compliance.
Besides which, if he’s no Jerry Brown or Jay Inslee leading his state towards a fossil-free future, McAuliffe is also not Ken Cuccinelli, hounding climate scientists out of state. Given a Republican majority in Virginia’s General Assembly that is dedicated to propping up the coal industry and blocking anything EPA does, it could have been so much worse.
So perhaps CCAN is letting the perfect be the enemy of the good—or in this case, letting the good be the enemy of the “meh.”
Regardless of how they feel about McAuliffe’s record, both the glass-half-full folks and the glass-half-empty folks agree there’s an “incomplete” on his report card that could make an enormous difference to his legacy. The ultimate test of the Governor’s climate credentials, they say, is whether he pushes DEQ to write a Clean Power Plan that puts a firm cap on total carbon emissions from the electric sector in Virginia. Though the General Assembly found a way to stop DEQ from completing work on the state implementation plan temporarily, nothing stops McAuliffe from taking a public stand on this most critical point.
That sounds like a no-brainer for a Democrat who is serious about reining in CO2. Unfortunately, it doesn’t meet with the approval of Tom Farrell, CEO of Dominion Resources, or Bob Blue, President of Dominion’s electric utility subsidiary, Dominion Virginia Power. They want DEQ to write a plan that leaves out new sources of emissions. That would let them continue building lots of big, new natural gas generating plants that, Blue assures us, will be capable of spewing carbon for at least another half century. All that burning of fracked gas would be lousy for the climate, but it would guarantee profits for Dominion’s utility and pipeline affiliate.
So on the one hand, the Governor can choose to be a climate hero, fighting sea level rise and deadly heat waves, creating tens of thousands of clean energy jobs and attracting forward-looking companies to the state, building his national reputation, doing what’s right for all our children and grandchildren, —
Or he can make Dominion happy.
It will be very interesting to see what becomes of that “incomplete” on his report card.
As a stakeholder in both the MVP and ACP , I have a strong dislike for McAuliffe.
Having donated to his gubernatorial campaign and even attended a fundraiser, I take umbrage to his stance on the benefits of the proposed pipelines and his total refusal to listen to the very valid objections of stakeholders.
I will never trust him again and his close relationship with Hillary Clinton re enforces my suspicion of her camp- It is easy to lie about what one stands for and then just thumb your nose in the faces of supporters once elected.
Pingback: Showdown over coal ash oversight looms in North Carolina | Southeast Energy News
As usual, you got it exactly right!
Sent from my iPhone
True, McAuliffe is not Ken Cuccinelli, but for some reason he’s protecting him, despite being well aware of evidence suggesting that Cuccinelli was behind the firing of UVa Pres. Teresa Sullivan and also that he intervened to prevent UVa’s Dept. of Environmental Sciences from offering a chaired position to climate scientist Michael Mann (his nemesis, whom Sullivan protected by denying Cucc. access to Mann’s papers). That information has been available since late 2012, yet too much of the press has pretended that it doesn’t exist. The Amer. Assoc. of Univ. Profs., in a 2013 report, lied through its teeth about the nature of available evidence about Sullivan’s firing and painted the incident as a tempest in a teapot (as had the NYT already). The coverup of Cuccinelli’s likely involvement is a scandal in and of itself — even the Washington Post willfully misreported the 2012 scandal by refusing to investigate obviously relevant evidence. If you doubt for a minute that Cuccinelli and his camp would stoop to corrupting such organizations, just remember who was running for governor in 2013. McAuliffe could have dealt a real blow to the climate-change deniers by ordering a full investigation of the incident when he took office in 2014, but chose not to. Why?